The Neglected Bridges

VG has been given access to the Norwegian Public Roads Administration (NPRA)’s digital database for bridges on national and county roads – a total of 16,971 bridges.

19 November 2005

Siri (16) and Henning (18) die in a car accident

Scroll down

Investigators believe the crash barrier contributed to the fatal accident

They call for all similar crash barriers to be mapped and improved

Twelve years on and it still hasn’t happened

Skip intro

VEME (VG) After the fatal accident in 2005, investigators called for crash barriers throughout Norway to be mapped and improved. ‘What good is it making a recommendation if nothing happens?’ asks the mother of Siri Tobiassen (16).

This is a tough time for Toril Engebretsen (50). On 19 November it was twelve years since she and her husband lost their only child. Siri was just 16 years old.

Advent reminds her of all the hours spent around the kitchen table with her daughter, baking, exchanging gifts and enjoying themselves. And the day after Boxing Day is Siri’s birthday. She would have been 29 years old.

‘Siri is dead. I’ll never get her back, but we'll do everything we can to make sure no one else will have to go through the indescribable pain of losing a child,’ says the mother.

Image description
TOUGH ADVENT: Toril Engebretsen remembers the happy times she spent with her daughter Siri in the run up to Christmas. Foto: Brian Cliff Olguin

In autumn 2005, Siri was studying to be a children and youth worker at Hønefoss upper secondary school. On Saturday 19 November, Toril Engebretsen drove her daughter and a friend to a party at Tyrifjorden. When the girls got out the car, Toril said just to call if they wanted a lift home.

Just before 11.30 that evening, four young people were sitting in a BMW. At the railway bridge in Ask, events took a turn for the worst. Exactly what happened, no one knows. But the car ended up on top of the safety barrier, and the left side was crushed against the bridge.

Two teenagers survived the accident. Siri and the driver, Henning Vollan Liuhagen (18), were killed.

Image description
FATALITIES: Siri Tobiassen (16) and Henning Vollan Liuhagen (18). Foto: Privat

After the accident, the family had very little information about how it could have happened. They learned that the car had been driving at a high speed, but were never told that accident investigators from the Norwegian Public Roads Administration (NPRA) also listed several other reasons why the accident had such a disastrous outcome: a sharp turn that should have been marked, worn tyres, an inexperienced driver – and a crash barrier that was too short and had an end terminal that was incorrectly constructed.

In order to prevent similar accidents in the future, the accident investigators recommended in 2005 that Norway’s entire road network be reviewed with a view to improving and modifying similar crash barriers.

The accident at Ask is one of 33 fatal accidents where NRPA investigators have established that faults or deficiencies in crash barriers on and adjacent to bridges have contributed to the severity of accidents.

The in-depth analysis of the 33 accidents was first presented to the Road Safety Committee in the Nordic Road Association in January 2016.

It was not until 19 months later that the findings were presented to the public in an article.

For the past year, VG has been charting the damage, maintenance and traffic safety on Norway’s 16,971 national and county road bridges. In the autumn, VG’s journalists started gathering information about inspections and maintenance. That’s when the NPRA started preparing its answers, as shown in e-mails that VG has gained access to.

Director of Traffic Safety
Guro Ranes
Press Manager
Kjell Bjørn Vinje
Director of Traffic Safety
Guro Ranes
Press Manager
Kjell Bjørn Vinje

On 27 September, NPRA's Director of Traffic Safety Guro Ranes receives an e-mail with the subject header ‘Bridges and TS’

The e-mail is from her NPRA colleague, Press Manager Kjell Bjørn Vinje

27 September

He informs her that VG is working on a major project related to bridges, and asks two specific questions:

From: Kjell Bjørn Vinje
To: Guro Ranes
Subject: Bridges and TS


Has poor securing of bridges had major repercussions for traffic safety?

Have we had any traffic fatalities due to poorly maintained bridges?


Read the full text of the e-mail

27 September

Ranes answers and refers to the analysis of crash barrier accidents, which has not yet been published

From: Guro Ranes
To: Kjell Bjørn Vinje
Subject: Re: Bridges and TS

Hi Kjell Bjørn

Thanks for the information

You've reminded me of something I have a very bad conscience about - the article about bridge crash barriers that Southern Region wrote based on UAG reports. We had plans to publish the article last summer/autumn, but it was put on the back boiler for a while and was then completely forgotten. Should we take it up again now?


Read the full text of the e-mail

3 October

A week later, Vinje notifies them of the analysis in an e-mail with the subject header ‘VG/bridge: info package’.

After explaining what VG had gained access to, Vinje writes:

Fra: Kjell Bjørn Vinje
To: The five regions
Subject: VG/bridges: info package

The Directorate wants a proactive media offensive (in the course of the week) for UAG themes related to bridges, crash barriers and fatal accidents.


Will probably be picked up by NRK Morgennytt news programme during the course of the week. Being run independently of the VG situation.

Read the full text of the e-mail

13 October

Ten days later NRK covers the story

Press Manager Kjell Bjørn Vinje says that the NPRA has published the in-depth analysis completely independently of VG’s bridge project, and writes in an e-mail: ‘The NPRA does not initiate a proactive media offensive ahead of negative items in the media. That’s not our practice, and that applies here too’.

Last week, VG asked Director of Traffic Safety, Guro Ranes, why it took so long to publish the article containing the in-depth analysis:

‘The presentation you are referring to is a series of overheads that was presented at a Nordic forum for traffic safety,’ says Ranes.

She adds that they wanted to present the results in a format that could be shared with more people.

Image description
IN CHARGE OF ROADS: Director of Traffic Safety Guro Ranes and Roads Director Terje Moe Gustavsen. Foto: Terje Bringedal

‘We chose an article format – and it’s a format that we’re not very used to for presenting results. It’s taken numerous rounds and much more time than we envisaged to work out the technicalities. It also has to do with the format; it’s quite a challenge trying to write succinctly. We had to get the article down to four pages instead of a more comprehensive and ‘boring’ report, which is the format we usually present results in.’

Do you have any tips to pass on about bridges in Norway?

Contact VG’s journalists or use VG’s encrypted tips portal

VG contacted Guro Ranes again after reading the e-mail dialogue where it says that the article was forgotten:

‘The reason why it took so long was two-fold. Firstly, the article format was new to us, and there were therefore more departments involved in the work than usual. Communications staff, UAGs and bridge staff were involved back and forwards. Unfortunately, we lost the thread along the way, and the work on publication stopped,’ writes Ranes.

‘This was obviously unfortunate. But when we discovered that the article had not been published, we picked up the thread again and quickly finished it. The article was then posted in the usual way – through our own channels, and through the media if we manage to do that.’

The analysis concludes that there is a need for a national survey of how many bridges have such problems.

Siri’s mother: ‘Something has to be done!’

Siri’s mother, Toril Engebretsen, says it’s shocking to hear that the article was forgotten.

‘It makes me both angry and sad. This is far too important to be shut away in a drawer for so long,’ she says.

Engebretsen has now read a copy of the in-depth analysis where her daughter’s accident is discussed. In total, 37 people have died in 33 fatal accidents.

‘It’s unbelievable. They themselves say that it has cost 37 lives. Thirty-seven! Imagine how many thousands of people are affected by these accidents. I feel that the NPRA has failed the road users,’ Toril says.

‘After the accident, they conclude that the entire road network should be reviewed, and such crash barriers should be improved. But what’s the point in making recommendations if nothing happens!’

‘It’s maybe possible to understand why not all crash barriers have been properly fixed yet?’

‘No, not really. If they can save just one life, then it must be done immediately. The NPRA needs to get an overview of the situation and make sure that politicians understand that this must be a priority,’ says Toril Engebretsen.

Thousands of bridges have faulty crash barriers

VG has mapped how many bridge crash barriers have faults or deficiencies that can affect traffic safety. The NPRA’s bridge register Brutus shows that 711 bridges have severe damage to the crash barriers. A total of 1085 bridges have vulnerable crash barriers, most of them failures to meet current safety requirements. In total, this concerns about 1745 individual bridges.

16,971 bridges

1745 bridges with a vulnerability

or severe damage to the crash barrier

These figures are probably incomplete. Even Roads Director Terje Moe Gustavsen has described the shortcomings in Brutus as severe.

In November, VG revealed extensive breaches of regulations as regards the registration and inspection of Norway's 17,000 national and county road bridges, and several road departments admitted that they have only used the Brutus registration system to a limited extent.

The revelations led to the Roads Director being reprimanded by the Minister of Transport and Communications, Ketil Solvik-Olsen. After the meeting, Gustavsen said that he had expressed that ‘we’re not on track with the registration’. The Roads Director has promised to sort out Brutus, and that complete figures for 2017 will be in place by 1 February next year.

Image description
CLEARING THE AIR: Here, the Head of the Roads and Transport Department Jane Bordal, Roads Director Terje Moe Gustavsen and Head of Section for Bridge Management and Preparedness Morten Wright Hansen, responded to the Minister of Transport and Communications after VG's revelation of insufficient inspection of Norwegian bridges. Foto: Frode Hansen

The Road Supervisory Authority (RSA), whose role is to ensure that the NPRA complies with laws and regulations, has also pointed out extensive registration shortcomings in the regulatory work in Northern Region and Western Region.

Despite the deficiencies that have been uncovered in Brutus, it’s this system that the Director of Traffic Safety, Guro Ranes, refers to when VG asks if the NPRA now has a complete overview of how many bridges have faulty or deficient crash barriers.

Reports and analyses have been calling for this situation to be mapped for more than ten years.

‘We’ve discussed and reviewed the situation with the section for bridges at the NPRA. Our assessment is that the registration of crash barriers and vulnerabilities in Brutus provides a good overview of the problem and scope,’ Ranes said last week.

She adds that she is confident that those who manage the road network have a good overview – and that shortcomings will be followed up and reported to the appropriate parties.

An internal e-mail that VG has gained access to, reveals that Bridge Director, Børre Stensvold, does not have the same confidence in the registration in Brutus being complete.

In the e-mail dated 21 September this year, Stensvold writes that the deviations uncovered by the RSA in Brutus are ‘very disturbing’:

From: Børre Stensvold, Bridge Director
To: Jane Bordal, Director Kjell Bjørn Vinje, Press Manager +2

[...] These are very disturbing instances of non-conformance, which in itself would be a good enough basis for a tabloid feature with fierce criticism of our procedures and follow-up systems. I didn’t think this was possible after working with such a strong focus on the technical side of bridge inspections for many years. This has also had both an external and internal focus, so I was confident we had better control. [...]

Conclusion: We can only show humility here and take full responsibility.

Read the full text of the e-mail

VG contacted NPRA’s Director of Traffic Safety, Guro Ranes, again after summing up the criticism of the registration shortcomings in Brutus.

‘My comments related to the task of conducting a systematic, general and technical assessment of crash barriers and roadside terrain,’ writes Ranes, and refers to the plans adopted in the National Transport Plan.

‘I didn’t mean to comment on errors and deficiencies in Brutus per se. The NPRA has competent experts in the regional units, and I am confident that they have a good overview of the situation, even though VG has uncovered deficiencies in the registration of inspections in Brutus,’ she adds.

Siri’s mother: Worth fighting for the rest of my life

A light permanently burns on the grave of Siri Tobiassen (16). Summer and winter, her parents visit the grave every three days and change the grave light. Toril shakes her head and says she knows it’s not really necessary: There’s already light where Siri is now. There was always joy and light around her daughter.

Image description
REMEMBERED: The photo of Siri Tobiassen has a prominent position at home in Veme, Ringerike. She would have been 29 just after Boxing Day. Foto: Brian Cliff Olguin

Shortly after the accident at Ask, Siri's father, Tormod Tobiassen, and Henning's father, Erik Liuhagen, started Siri and Henning’s memorial fund – which for the past twelve years has campaigned for preventive road safety.

‘It was important for my husband to find a meaning in the meaningless. Talking to the youth community here, so that at least we do whatever we can to ensure that this never happens again.’

‘If we can help to save even just one family from the grief we have suffered, then it's worth fighting for the rest of our lives,’ Toril says.

‘Far more than just statistics to us’

Director of Traffic Safety Guro Ranes says she has a lot of respect and understanding for what Siri’s family have gone through and the grief they've endured.

‘All of these fatal accidents are far more than just statistics to us. It's important for me to be able to say that. Every accident is one we want to avoid’.

‘The accident report concludes that the entire road network should be reviewed and crash barriers improved. Siri's mother asks what's the point of a recommendation if nothing is done?’

‘It’s perhaps difficult for the family or relatives of someone who died in an accident to see how the analysis from that single accident has helped improve traffic safety, and I understand that. But those of us who work with traffic safety know that what has come from each analysis, and not least the sum of them, means that we’re now far better equipped to propose good measures and point out where we still have challenges,’ says Ranes.

‘I realise this is of no comfort to this family, but the number of fatalities has halved since 2005, and that’s not just a coincidence.’

‘Siri’s mother says it's hard to understand that this situation has not been rectified yet, and that the NPRA needs to obtain an overview of the situation and make sure that politicians understand that this must be a priority. Do you have such an overview and have you done enough to ensure that this is being prioritised?’

‘I think we have a reasonably good overview of this and many other challenges within traffic safety. But it’s always complicated having to explain how big the challenge is or how important it is. There are many challenges in the road network and many competing goals,’ says Ranes.

NPRA: Many barriers have been modified

Recommendations from accident reports are not automatically backed up with funding. Today, the reports do not recommend concrete action points as they did in 2005, but instead point out safety issues and proposals that are evaluated by those responsible for our roads.

Ranes emphasises that the cost of making a bridge or crash barrier safer for traffic varies considerably:

‘There are huge variations, from relatively simple repairs or replacing crash barrier end terminals, to building a new bridge or new road. The mapping work that started in the early 2000s, when they began reporting non-conformance of the standard requirements of the day, has meant that over time, a relatively large number of crash barriers on and adjacent to bridges have been replaced and improved,’ she says.

Click here to see all 16,971 bridges on the map – and read the reports for the individual bridges.

How we did it

  • 1. The NPRA’s database is called Brutus. This is a bridge management system that the NPRA itself has developed. Each bridge has its own health status journal.

  • 2. In March, VG was given access to the database via PDF files for all of the 16,971 bridges on Norway’s national and country roads, where the NPRA is responsible.

  • 3. Based on these data, VG has visited 104 bridges in 15 counties.

  • 4. Analysis of the reports and VG’s own observations show that the NPRA systematically breaks the rules they are required to follow in order to ensure that Norwegian road bridges are safe.

Scroll right

Published: 18 December 2017


Undercover Darkweb
VG har avslørt verdens største overgrepsforum. Det ble drevet av politiet.
Kampen om de hemmelige Røkke-opptakene
I flere år har Kjell Inge Røkke (58) kjempet for å hindre at lydopptak av private samtaler kommer ut i offentligheten. Det har han klart. Frem til nå.
Hvorfor har ingen etterlyst den unge, elegante kvinnen som ble funnet død på Oslo Plaza? Etter 22 år er graven åpnet.
Makt­spillet om nød­sentralene
Her spiser de kake under åpningen av den nye operasjonssentralen i Oslo. Men bak den idylliske fasaden har det i flere år rast en rå maktkamp.
Tyske Peer Salström-Leyhs (63) stiftelser har fått nærmere en halv milliard for å drive fosterhjem i Norge. Etter få år sitter de igjen med store overskudd — samtidig som millioner er ført ut av landet.
11 millioner bistands­kroner
Norad mener deres erfaring fra Finansdepartementet er så verdifull for utviklingsland, at de har sendt dem rundt i verden for å dele sine råd og erfaringer. Prislapp: 11 millioner bistandskroner.
SKUP-prisen 2016
VG har gjennomgått og digitalisert innholdet i over 2500 beltelegginger fra tvangsprotokollene. Dette materialet gir et innblikk i hvordan mekaniske tvangsmidler brukes og begrunnes ved norske sykehus.
SKUP-diplom 2016
Millionærer på bistand
VG kan dokumentere at oppdrag for verdens fattigste har blitt god business for eiertrioen bak International Law and Policy Institute (ILPI).
Årets nyhetsdekning
Privatetterforsker, journalist og forfatter Geir Selvik Malthe-Sørenssen (50) har de siste fem årene beskyldt politiet for bevisjuks og forfalskninger i Treholt-saken. Nå avsløres han selv for juks.
Årets digitale historie
SKUP-diplom 2016
Et lydopptak kunne legge advokatkarrieren til Amir Mirmotahari i grus. Noen tjente store penger på det. Dette er jakten på de ukjente pengeutpresserne.
Årets digitale historie
SKUP-diplom 2016
Advokaten og torpedoen
Forsvarsadvokat Amir Mirmotahari ba torpedoen kidnappe og dope ned et voldtektsoffer. Målet var å holde henne unna rettssalen – slik at klienten hans gikk fri.